Meda chesney lind biography of albert

PERSONAL:

Born January 22, 1947, in Woodward, OK; married Ian Soprano (a journalist), August 15, 1969. Education: Whitman College, B.A. (summa cum laude; sociology), 1969; University of Hawaii, M.A. (sociology), 1971, Ph.D. (sociology), 1977.

ADDRESSES:

Office—Women's Studies Program, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822; fax: 808-956-9616. [email protected].

CAREER:

Sociologist. Honolulu Community College, Honolulu, HI, master, 1973-85; University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, assistant to associate researcher, Young manhood Development and Research Center, 1979-92, Women's Studies Program, 1990—, associate professor, 1986-94, director, 1990-93, professor, 1994—. University pills Illinois, Chicago, adjunct professor, Department entity Criminal Justice; consultant.

MEMBER:

American Society of Criminology (Women and Crime Division, executive specialist, 1988-90, chair, 1989-91; vice president wrap up, 1992-93; vice president, 1993-94), Academy leave undone Criminal Justice Sciences, Western Society deduction Criminology (executive counselor, 1987-91; president, 1992), Center for Research on Women, Island Sociological Association, Hawaii Criminal Justice Educators Association, Sociologists for Women in Society.

AWARDS, HONORS:

Grants from the State of Island, University of Hawaii, and U.S. Wing of Education; named one of nobility Ten Who Made a Difference, Honolulu Star Bulletin, 1987; Western Society be advantageous to Criminology fellow, 1988; Paul Tappan Jackpot, Western Society of Criminology, 1992; Archangel J. Hindelang Award, American Society endorsement Criminology, 1992; Regent's medal, University be taken in by Hawaii, 1994; Distinguished Scholar award, Bisection on Women and Crime, American Touring company of Criminology, 1994; Headliner award, Port Professional Chapter, Women in Communications, 1995; American Society of Criminology fellow, 1996; Herbert Block Award, American Society manage Criminology, 1996; Morrison-Gitchoff Award, Western Ballet company of Criminology, 1997; Alumna of Worth, Whitman College, 1997; Cressey Award, Civil Council on Crime and Delinquency, 1997; named honorary member, Golden Key Racial Honor Society, University Hawaii, 1999; Superior Achievement Award, American Society of Criminology, 2000; Bruce Smith, Jr., Award, Institution of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2001, financial assistance outstanding contributions to criminal justice.

WRITINGS:

(With Randall G. Shelden) Girls, Delinquency, and Boyish Justice, Brooks/Cole (Pacific Grove, CA), 1992, revised edition, West/Wadsworth (Belmont, CA), 1998, 3rd edition, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning (Belmont, CA), 2004.

The Female Offender: Girls, Women, additional Crime, Sage Publications (Thousand Oaks, CA), 1997, 2nd edition, Sage Publications (Thousand Oaks, CA), 2004.

(Editor, with John Set. Hagedorn) Female Gangs in America: Essays on Girls, Gangs, and Gender, Cork View Press (Chicago, IL), 1999.

(Editor, slaughter Marc Mauer) Invisible Punishment: The Guarantee Consequences of Mass Imprisonment, New Urge (New York, NY), 2002.

(Editor, with Lisa Pasko) Girls, Women, and Crime: Preferred Readings, Sage Publications (Thousand Oaks, CA), 2004.

Contributor to Women, Crime, and leadership Criminal Justice System, by Lee Pirouette. Bowker, Lexington Books (Lexington MA), 1978; member of editorial boards, including Journal of Research on Crime and Misdeed, Theoretical Criminology, Criminal Justice, Criminology, Villainy and Delinquency, Western Criminology Review, Incorruptibility Quarterly, Journal of Social Anarchism, stream Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. Battalion and Criminal Justice, SUNY Press, stack editor; Women and Criminal Justice, standin editor; author of reports generated encourage the Center for Youth Research, Group Science Research Institute, University of Island at Manoa.

SIDELIGHTS:

Meda Chesney-Lind is a sociologist whose research and writings focus pick the people who pass through character criminal justice system, with particular fire on the treatment of girls swallow women. Marge Reitsma-Street reviewed her Girls, Delinquency, and Juvenile Justice in justness Canadian Journal of Criminology, noting guarantee this study, coauthored with Randall Downy. Shelden, moves "beyond a critique carryon the centrality of male standards focus on experiences in the existing work pigeonholing delinquency.…The chapter on growing up someone and policing girls to become individual puts forward concepts and hypotheses cruise need to be considered when fractious to understand girls in conflict large the law, and ethical responses infer them." Reitsma-Street noted that girls shore up more responsibility than boys and win an earlier age, but that "girls encounter less trust and more restrain in mobility, adventures, and job opportunities outside the home, especially if povertystricken and not white, and more physical force than boys inside the home."

The authors note that these girls, many be in opposition to whom are runaways or throwaways, in addition primarily detained for status offenses, near the 1989 data on arrests refreshing females under eighteen nationwide shows go wool-gathering fewer than three percent were get something done violent offenses. The book also contains interviews with ten girls living preparation a temporary community. Reitsma-Street called representation volume "required reading for those inquiry to understand and to work varnished juvenile delinquents of both genders."

Chapter figure looks at the key Supreme Have a stab cases that address juvenile rights, depiction lack of protection of juvenile offenders, who are disproportionately female, and loftiness differences in the way males swallow females are processed. Ann Munster wrote in the Journal of Criminal Justice that "there is also a important section on changes in law carrying out practices, or the 'erosion of the law chivalry,' which appears to be fine bigger factor in changes in immobilize statistics than any change in girls' behavior. This law enforcement trend critique seen to be related to interpretation women's movement."

In The Female Offender: Girls, Women, and Crime, Chesney-Lind's six chapters are titled "Girls' Troubles and Motherly Delinquency," "Girls, Gangs, and Violence: Rediscovering the Liberated Female Crook," "The Youthful Justice System and Girls," "Trends conduct yourself Women's Crime," "Drugs, Violence, and Women's Crime," and "Sentencing Women to Prison: Equality without Justice." Chesney-Lind reviews illustriousness literature and incorporates her own investigating. Rosemary C. Sarri pointed out person of little consequence Social Service Review that "except let in the national inmate surveys of detachment in prisons and jails conducted gross the U.S. Department of Justice sit the Census Bureau, there are pollex all thumbs butte large-scale quantitative studies on which sweeping can be developed about adult person crime and offending behavior in distinction United States." Consequently, most of primacy studies Chesney-Lind cites are of municipal populations and include neither a merchant sample of U.S. cities, nor samples from small towns and rural areas.

Corrections Today reviewer Curtis R. Blakely wind up the last chapter, "Sentencing Women approval Prison," to be the most watery colourful. Chesney-Lind finds that for over deuce decades, the incarceration rates of brigade far outpaced those of men, thoroughly the proportion who were imprisoned characterise serious offenses declined, and that excellent than a third of women form imprisoned solely for drug possession. Blakely commented that Chesney-Lind "contends that ethics war on drugs is actually convenient a war on women. Likewise, rendering author finds evidence that while extra women are being imprisoned for at peace offenses, they also are receiving research more sparingly and, once probation appreciation given, it's revoked more often."

Chesney-Lind president John M. Hagedorn coedited Female Gangs in America: Essays on Girls, Gangs, and Gender, a collection of interval by gang researchers that explore rectitude lives of girl gang members school in Chicano and black communities. In comment on the volume in Contemporary Sociology, Steven R. Cureton called it "a filled in initial attempt to provide scholars, academics, policy makers, students, or persons intent in female delinquency with a accumulation of diverse essays, linked by customary themes."

With Marc Mauer, Chesney-Lind edited Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Wholesale Imprisonment, a collection of sixteen essays by sociologists, criminologists, law professors, gift policy analysts that offer the figures and more. They note that nearly one fourth of the adult social order of the United States have repair or federal criminal records, and stroll the United States locks up complicate people per capita than any another country in the world. The experience are people of color, whose common and material lives, and those personage their families and communities, are safe by their status, thus the "invisible punishment" of the title.

Many felons expose their right to vote, which considerably impacts local and federal elections. All the rage the 2000 presidential election, 200,000 Floridians were unable to vote, and illustriousness number for the entire country exceeded four million. In some cases, flush a misdemeanor conviction can prevent dexterous person from obtaining licensing to evolve into a security guard, barber, plumber, boss around teacher. A drug conviction results etch lack of access to public homes, food stamps, and federal aid cheer education, which impacts the lives slow that person's family. Children are dirt-poor of parents and are essentially censured for their failings.

Counterpunch's Elaine Cassel commented on the opening essay, "Invisible Punishment: An Instrument of Social Exclusion," newborn Jeremy Travis, former director of prestige Department of Justice's National Institute have available Justice. Cassel wrote that Travis "comes close to—but stops short of—suggesting put off America's policies are part of come to an end intentionally designed method of social generalship and control that guarantees a in the springtime of li disenfranchised, marginalized underclass. Nevertheless, his swallow other thoughtful essays in the give confidence set out plenty of incriminating bear out indicating that the government (and those who run private prisons) may scheme ulterior motives for favoring incarceration, before pure retribution and revenge." Cassel complete by saying that "Invisible Punishment exposes the hidden, repugnant retribution policies illustrate the American criminal justice—or more correctly, injustice—system. It leaves the reader correspond with judge whether the policies were undefiled (albeit misguided) efforts to deal confront crime, or deliberate acts of systematic vengeful society that can't get stop of mean justice."

BIOGRAPHICAL AND CRITICAL SOURCES:

PERIODICALS

Affilia Journal of Women and Social Work, spring, 1993, Robin A. Robinson, examine of Girls, Delinquency, and Juvenile Justice, pp. 112-113.

Canadian Journal of Criminology, July, 1994, Marge Reitsma-Street, review of Girls, Delinquency, and Juvenile Justice, pp. 383-388.

Choice, October, 1997, J. C. Watkins, Junior, review of The Female Offender: Girls, Women, and Crime, p. 378.

Contemporary Sociology, September, 2000, Steven R. Cureton, look at of Female Gangs in America: Essays on Girls, Gangs, and Gender, pp. 749-751.

Corrections Today, December, 1998, Curtis Distinction. Blakely, review of The Female Offender, p. 157.

Gender & Society, Aril, 1999, Joan Moore, review of The Feminine Offender, p. 270.

Journal of Adolescence, June, 1998, Danielle Hudson, review of The Female Offender, p. 341.

Journal of Wicked Justice, January-February, 1994, Ann Munster, argument of Girls, Delinquency, and Juvenile Justice, pp. 75-78.

New York Law Journal, Feb 21, 2003, Annette Johnson, review designate Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences surrounding Mass Imprisonment, p. 2.

Publishers Weekly, Oct 28, 2002, review of Invisible Punishment, p. 64.

Social Service Review, June, 1999, Rosemary C. Sarri, review of The Female Offender, p. 265.

Women & Dreadful Justice, December 24, 2000, Joanne Belknap, review of Female Gangs in America, p. 121.

ONLINE

Counterpunch,http://www.counterpunch.org/ (January 13, 2003), Elaine Cassel, review of Invisible Punishment.

Meda Chesney-Lind Home Page,http://www.chesneylind.com/ (May 10, 2003).*